A company with Liberty in the name yet they make a back door access to thier product and hand it over to the feds.
A "default code that opens them all" means it's not a safe. With all the leakers in the DOJ it's only a matter of time before the "secret code" is leaked or now that people know about the secret code someone will crack it. Once either happens all liberty safes are obsolete.
Fresh: liberty safes was sold by the original owners in 2021 to a woke investing firm... And liberty safe higher ups donated to the dnc. They're fk'n done.
Kind of like tractors and vehicles now, they can be turned on and off, locked and unlocked all remotely by the company and its not a stretch that local, State and Federal agencies will have access to that at some point if not already. Big Brother is watching you and collecting your habits and data whether you believe he is or not. Imagine the day in the not so distant future when the Big Brother Orders lock downs and you say "I will not comply!" and you go out to your vehicle and are locked out of it and it won't start when you do gain entry
I love old cars, trucks, tractors, etc., and my door uses a key!  I can grow my own food, make my own fuel, have a generator and solar power set-up, well, septic tank., and some of my guns and ammo are hidden so well that I might not be able to find them!  Also, everyone should have PMs, cash and pre-paid debt cards!
If the FBI or any LEO had a warrant and wanted to search that safe it would be searched if they had to destroy it and everything in it. The best thing would be for the owner to provide the access code to the FBI, ATF, police, sheriff, etc., provided they have a warrant. There is NO safe that can't be cracked!
Yes, but it certainly shouldn't be the safe manufacturer to open it for them. The owner of the safe should be the only one with the code. I mean, they sell you a safe that has a backdoor in it...what kind of bullshit is that and didn't tell us? I got a Liberty and now I got to look around and see if someone makes a lock that DOESN'T have a backdoor. Screw them. I'll never use their product again. EDIT: Didn't Apple refuse to open one of their phones for the Feds?
Hang on, I believe the previous owners of Liberty had offered an additional ''safe'' storage with you're combination on file if you registered the safe with them. Sound familiar? What the squawk is about is Liberty safe provided the combination pre search warrant to fed Zilla Granted fedzilla could of had a warrant with-in 30 minutes its just Liberty provided the combination pre-warrant.
If cops were smart enough to crack a safe they wouldn't be cops. Problem is the new owners donate to the dnc plus select gun grabber politicians and they appeared to do this as a favor.
Let's be clear...So, are you saying that the individual had selected to have their combination on file with Liberty as a precautionary measure? That is very different than a backdoor. So, now we need to know which version is true. As far as giving the FBI the individual's combination which was on file OR the backdoor without a warrant - well - that sounds to me like a valid reason to sue.
According to the original post, the FBI did have a warrant, which was provided to the company! So stop making mountains out of mole-hills! Also, remember how outraged people were when Apple refused to open that phone, which was evidence in a criminal case. The FBI had to get some Israeli hackers to open the phone!
I admit that I am bias against the FBI these days and I believe for good reasons; however, if they indeed had a warrant then case closed. However, the question remains if these safes do indeed have a backdoor, a master combination? In my mind, they should not because this leaves the individual/customer at risk. EDIT: Frankly, I don't believe they do but haven't the time to research it now, will do later today.