New Hampshire Vote Fraud.

This space reserved.

 

come on hanging chads

 

Sutton County, with 100% reporting reported 0 votes for paul but poster in Sutton posted:

Quote:
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td class="alt2" style="border: 1px inset ;"> My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn't corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???

Originally Posted by sstjean View Post
This was posted to ronpaul-801 tonight: "This town numbers are wrong wrong wrong on this map. I am from Sutton originally and my parents and one aunt all voted for Ron Paul today and Sutton says 0. So this is wrong. This is a town that had 20 people counting the ballots and I have no reason to believe that they cheated. Small town and I was born and raised there. The real numbers will come in by morning. The electronic machines in the big towns are the ones we have to worry about."

BUMP </td> </tr> </tbody></table>
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...166#post885166


[FONT=Verdana, arial, helvetica]John Silvestro and his small private business, LHS Associates, has the exclusive programming contracts for all New Hampshire voting machines, which combined will count about 81 percent of the vote tomorrow.

Silvestro IS the New Hampshire chain of custody
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/mess...tml?1199848459

[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, arial, helvetica]UPDATE: 4 pm EST Jan 8: The first order of business tonight needs to be to compare results in the hand counted paper ballot locations vs. the Silvestro-programmed Diebold machine locations. Here's a link to feed for AP results when they come in:
http://www.thetelegraph.com/news/new...hampshire.html

Comma delimited database: NH municipalities hand count vs use Diebold machines: http://www.bbvdocs.org/NH/state/Jan-...systems-NH.txt

Then there is this:
http://www.libertybroadcastnetwork.org/locations_nh.htm

And this is a real eye opener:

YouTube- Rigged USA Elections Exposed
[/FONT]

 

DEMAND: NH STATE HIGHLY SCRUTINIZED RECOUNT. NOW!!!!!!!!

By Ken | January 9, 2008

<!--content with more link--> <!-- sphereit start --> Bev Harris, of BlackBoxVoting.org, has verified in Sutton that Ron Paul had 31 votes but the city clerk admits they “accidentally” put 0 (zero) on final tally sheet. That is just one town! *oops*
If Trevor Lyman needs to put up a page to raise the $67K outside of the official campaign office to accomplish this, then let’s do it! Also suspicious is high numbers of votes under the “Other” column, and also that these high numbers occur much more on GOP side than Dem side. Nothing more to say.
<!-- Social Bookmarking Reloaded BEGIN -->

<!-- Social Bookmarking Reloaded END --><!-- sphereit end --> Sphere: Related Content

<!--for paginate posts--> Topics: Breaking News, New Hampshire, vote fraud |




130 Comments:
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=721

 

Greenville Vote Discrepancy SAME as Sutton

By AnalogDan | January 9, 2008

<!--content with more link--> <!-- sphereit start --> We have caught Sutton red-handed. However, there are other other tonwships that have been reporting 0 votes, including Greenville, as sourced here:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/county/#val=NHREP9
Moreover, when Sutton had been found out, they quickly added 31 votes, and cited ‘human error.’ What is their excuse for this source, now showing Greenville at 25 votes:
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=news0807
Ladies and gentlemen, this is a pattern. Let’s get this info out ASAP.
<!-- Social Bookmarking Reloaded BEGIN -->

<!-- Social Bookmarking Reloaded END --><!-- sphereit end --> Sphere: Related Content

<!--for paginate posts--> Topics: Uncategorized |

<!--all options over and out--><!--include comments template--> <!-- You can start editing here. --> 8 Responses to “Greenville Vote Discrepancy SAME as Sutton”

1. <!--the bgein of one comment-->
2. <cite>patriotbeliever</cite> Says:
   <small>January 9th, 2008 at 12:28 pm </small> I noticed Greenville, Millsfield, Dixville and Wentworth’s area as well
   Also the CNN source for Sutton, as of 3:29pm EST (1-9-08) still showed 0%
3. <cite>AnalogDan</cite> Says:
   <small>January 9th, 2008 at 12:42 pm </small> The neo-cons are gonna say that the press release of this information is not as official as the final release, and I’m sure they’ll say that these votes will be counted. We have definitely made a stir, and I hope folks get MAD!
4. <cite>RayB</cite> Says:
   <small>January 9th, 2008 at 1:20 pm </small> The Ron Paul supporters should set up a special found to have recounts so that Ron Paul doesn’t have to use his money.
5. <cite>Ken</cite> Says:
   <small>January 9th, 2008 at 1:21 pm </small> I realize the NH Sec of State has not yet released “certified” results. This pressure may do some good even before having to call for a recount. We can’t even call for a recount until there are certified results filed/released.
6. <cite>corvax22</cite> Says:
   <small>January 9th, 2008 at 2:04 pm </small> HERE ARE THE LINKS TO SCREEN SHOTS OF VERY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY NOTICE THE TIME MY COMPUTER IN RELATION TO THE VOTE COUNTS. DOVERS TOTAL VOTE COUNT GOES DOWN BY TEN AFTER THE 6TH OF 6 STATION REPORTS IN. ALSO CHECK OUT KEENE AND NASHUA NUMBERS. ALL LINKS ARE LABELED BY CITY I HAVE OTHER SCREEN SHOTS JUST NOT SURE IF THIERS ANYTHING ON THEM I’LL WORK ON GETTING THEM ALL UP SOON.
   OOPS CLOSED THAT LAST POST BEFORE I WAS FINISHED
   IN THE NASHUA POST AT 9:43 RON PAUL VOTES DROP TO 30 FROM 745 ANYHOW JUST LOOK THROUGHT THE SCREEN SHOTS BY CORRELATING THE CITY NAME IN URL THEN TIME STAMPS YOU’LL SEE WHAT I’MA TALKING ABOUT
   PLEASE EVERYONE VIEW THIS BULLSHIT
   http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee183/corvax22/nashua9-9-1000-pst.jpg
   http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee183/corvax22/nashua7-9810pst.jpg
   http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee183/corvax22/nashua7-9-943-PST.jpg
   http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee183/corvax22/keene9-9-959-pst.jpg
   http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee183/corvax22/keene4-5-957-pst.jpg
   http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee183/corvax22/keene4-5-938-pst.jpg
   http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee183/corvax22/dover6-6.jpg
   http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee183/corvax22/dover5-6-1.jpg
   http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee183/corvax22/dover5-6.jpg
7. <cite>Clear Evidence Of Widespread Vote Fraud In New Hampshire « Truthspace’s Research</cite> Says:
   <small>January 9th, 2008 at 3:44 pm </small> […] in Sutton had not been counted, other districts where Paul had supposedly received zero votes, such as Greenville, suddenly changed their final tallies and attributed votes to the […]
8. <cite>GaryF</cite> Says:
   <small>January 9th, 2008 at 3:51 pm </small> We can’t stand for this crap AGAIN. These NWO hacks cannot be allowed to steal yet another election. We need to make some noise!!!
9. <cite>RayB</cite> Says:
   <small>January 9th, 2008 at 4:04 pm </small> All this point to the Bildenbergs. H. Clinton is their chosen one for this round.

 

Vote Fraud CONFIRMED - Paper vs. Electronic Ballots

By greves | January 8, 2008

<!--content with more link--> <!-- sphereit start --> A Ron Paul fan has put together this wonderful little table that shows precisely what happened in the towns with paper ballots vs. the towns with Diebold Accuvote optical scanner electronic voting machines.


http://ronrox.com/paulstats.php
You can see clearly by looking at the column in red how much the electronic voting machines gave or took away from a candidate. Ron Paul lost 2%+, whereas Giuliani got a 0.5% boost, stealing 4th from Ron Paul. You can also see that Mitt Romney really didn’t have 31%, but something closer to 25%, a throw of 6% in his favor.



If you’re skeptical that these numbers are indeed meaningful, just look at the Democratic field using the link on the page. No statistical difference except for 2 candidates: Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Clinton got a 5-point boost from the machines, whereas Obama got a 2-point drop. With only a 3-point spread in the final count, it is obvious that Obama won New Hampshire - the establishment throws for their fellow Bilderberger.

 

Clear Evidence Of Widespread Vote Fraud In New Hampshire
Paul and Obama cheated out of 3rd and 1st by voting machines, hand count fraud <table border="0" width="445"> <tbody><tr> <td height="47" width="397"> Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, January 9, 2008
</td> <td valign="bottom" width="17"> </td> <td valign="bottom" width="17">

<script language="" type="text/javascript"> digg_title = 'Clear Evidence Of Widespread Vote Fraud In New Hampshire'; digg_bodytext = 'There were several major vote fraud issues to arise out of the New Hampshire primary revolving mainly around Ron Paul and Barack Obama, who were both seemingly cheated out of third and first places respectively as a result of rigged Diebold voting machines and deliberate malfeasance in the counting of hand-written paper ballots.'; </script> <script language="" src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"> </script><iframe src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.php?u=http%3A//www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/010908_widespread_fraud.htm&t=Clear%20Evidence%20Of%20Widespread%20Vote%20Fraud%20In%20New%20Hampshire&b=There%20were%20several%20major%20vote%20fraud%20issues%20to%20arise%20out%20of%20the%20New%20Hampshire%20primary%20revolving%20mainly%20around%20Ron%20Paul%20and%20Barack%20Obama%2C%20who%20were%20both%20seemingly%20cheated%20out%20of%20third%20and%20first%20places%20respectively%20as%20a%20result%20of%20rigged%20Diebold%20voting%20machines%20and%20deliberate%20malfeasance%20in%20the%20counting%20of%20hand-written%20paper%20ballots." frameborder="0" height="80" scrolling="no" width="52"></iframe> ​

</td> </tr> </tbody></table>

There were several major vote fraud issues to arise out of the New Hampshire primary revolving mainly around Ron Paul and Barack Obama, who were both seemingly cheated out of third and first places respectively as a result of rigged Diebold voting machines and deliberate malfeasance in the counting of hand-written paper ballots.


- Obama had a 13 to 15 point lead over Hillary Clinton heading into the primary. Nothing occured that boosted Hillary's numbers immediately before the election, in fact immediately after the staged crying incident, many pundits argued it could only have harmed her chances. And yet Hillary somehow managed to instigate a near 20 point swing to defeat Obama by three per cent. If not for her 7% swing as a result of Diebold voting machines, Hillary would have lost to Obama. If Obama was struggling he would probably contest this bizarre outcome, but he is likely to accept the results simply to save face.


- The New Hampshire town of Sutton admits that it voided every vote Ron Paul received. The Congressman got 31 votes and yet due to a "human error," Sutton reported zero votes for Ron Paul. How "human error" can explain not counting 31 votes in succession for one single candidate is beyond the pale and Ron Paul's campaign should ask for a recount across New Hampshire immediately.


- As soon as people went public with the fact that their votes in Sutton had not been counted, other districts where Paul had supposedly received zero votes, such as Greenville, suddenly changed their final tallies and attributed votes to the Congressman. <!--end--> ​

(Article continues below)

<script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "pub-9994680918456566"; google_ad_width = 336; google_ad_height = 280; google_ad_format = "336x280_as"; google_ad_type = "text_image"; //2007-05-09: pmarticle google_ad_channel = "7743333083"; google_color_border = "FFFFFF"; google_color_bg = "FFFFFF"; google_color_link = "000000"; google_color_text = "000000"; google_color_url = "000000"; //-->*</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"></script> ​

<!--start--> - Going into New Hampshire Ron Paul was polling in the early teens and was a strong bet to take third place behind McCain and Romney. Four days before the vote, Rasmussen had Paul at 14% - a significant lead over Huckabee on 11% and Giuliani on 8% - and yet Ron Paul finished with just 8%. Proof of clear vote fraud, allied with the fact that Paul's numbers show a 6% swing from normally accurate pre-polling forecasts, clearly indicate chicanery was at hand, especially considering the fact that Paul lost those crucial few percentage points to Giuliani as a reuslt of electronic Diebold voting machines which are known to be wide open to tampering and fraud.

- Going purely on hand-counts, which as we saw in Sutton were by no means angelic but at least harder to cheat on than Diebold voting machines without getting caught, Ron Paul would have won 15% of the vote and finished third. This figure would have more accurately correlated to the pre-primary polls rather than the ridiculous 8% he was eventually given.


- Numerous districts reported totals of anything up to 22% for "other candidates". What on earth does this black hole of "other candidates" mean? How can one vote for a candidate that is not on the ballot without spoiling the ballot paper? The district of Lisbon reported 22.5% votes for this mysterious "other" candidate, while in the large district of Londonderry, the "other" candidate received 10%. Many are now alleging that these "other" votes were merely siphoned from Ron Paul to keep his final number low.


- Rudy Giuliani, the 9/11 candidate who beat Ron Paul thanks to the aid of a 3% swing on Diebold voting machines, received 9.11% of the vote in three different towns. Coincidence or somebody's idea of a sick joke? ​

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <!--end-->
​

<table height="93" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td height="72" valign="top">

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript" color="#FFFFFF" src="http://ekstreme.com/socializer/socializer.js"></script>Social bookmark this page
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=-2] Print Friendly Page[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif] [SIZE=-2]Yahoo! MyWeb[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=-2] Del.icio.us[/SIZE][/FONT] [SIZE=-2]Digg Reddit [/SIZE]
​

</td></tr></tbody></table>

 

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenumbers/2008/01/new-hampshires.html

 

Wow. Home video showing totals from the Boston Globe. It was a RP landslide...

[media]http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=547_1199910913&p=1[/media]

 

Something is rotten in Denmark, that's for sure. Is there a retraction printed anywhere in the Globe?

 

Well...I wasn't wrong. You will note that I called it, although I feel no pride at all in claiming to have known that Hillary would be the chosen and Diebold will undoubtedly continue to muck things up. I also mentioned secret societies and how easy it is for a few to corrupt political parties. I guarantee you that there are sinister members in every party, and with each campaign. Do I expect to be congratulated for being so "wise"? Hell no. What I expect is something like Goatman said. I expect a revolution. I expect to see demonstrations and protests on every street corner. And in actuality, I expect to see Americans resisting tyranny only after the situation is beyond hope, and there is less than a precarious chance of victory. Of course, by then those numbers will be dwindled to include outcasts and informed Patriots who have managed to remain out of prison confinement. BAH. Don't mind me. I'm just upset, even though I expected all of this...it's just so damned frustrating. GAAAH.

We will have to see. I mean, how long will it take -how far does this have to go until the People have had enough? Sadly, with the majority still tuned in to FOX and CNN...nothing will change. Hannity and Limbaugh will continue to place their spin on truth, and the papers will still ignore candidates like Paul and that he even exists. And tomorrow, the world will only know that Hillary is in office as President and Bill is the "first man". It will spawn discussions and spots on every talk show. The mundane will watch their God boxes in awe and smile complacently, listless and completely clueless. The shadow of control will grow, fear will take hold as disasters will ensue as planned, and everything will go as planned.

The question remains; will the first woman "president" be a savior, or a conqueror?

I guess we will just have to tune in to find out.

 

http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=221882
IT IS OFFICIAL NOW!

http://grannywarrior.chipin.com/recount

I just received word that the papers have been filed. There will be a press conference at 1:30 PM Eastern time.

I have never felt so proud to be a part of anything as I am right now. We got a call this morning that the Secretary of state would not accept anything other than a certified check or cash which our man did not have. He called us, we remembered a friend in NH we had met there and called Eric. Within 10 minutes he was in his car and on the way to the State house with the money.

He just called and is so happy with Mr. Howard, he says he is a real good guy. This makes me happy also as I had no idea of what kind of person he really is.. Eric and his wife will be keeping up with him and videoing the events as they occur so you can all be kept informed on where your money is going.

I am so privileged to be associated with such good, decent and patriotic people

 

IMHO, The entire Hanging chad fiasco was pushed so as to make us cry out for a better system. well, we have the new system and it is highly suspicious.

There is a Youtube somewhere that shows someone with a Diebold machine illustrating all the things they can do with it to change the results.

IF, any of this is true, it means that the last bastion of our Democratic Republic is gone and there should be an outcry.