Second Amendment State/LEO response to federal gun ban threat

Discussion in 'Bill of Rights' started by CATO, Jan 10, 2013.


Page 5 of 7
  1. ditch witch

    ditch witch I do stupid crap, so you don't have to

    Yeah the Texas sheriffs have been rather silent about it as well. I like to think that they are mostly older guys and perhaps not very internet savvy and that they DID send a letter but haven't added their name to the list.

    I dunno tho...
     
    ditch witch, Jan 31, 2013
    #81
  2. oldawg

    oldawg Monkey+++

    Ours here in Mclennan county Texas finally got on board.Was starting to wonder there.
     
    oldawg, Feb 1, 2013
    #82
    ditch witch likes this.
  3. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++

    CATO, Feb 1, 2013
    #83
  4. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++

    CATO, Feb 1, 2013
    #84
  5. BTPost

    BTPost Stumpy Old Fart,Deadman Walking, Snow Monkey Moderator

    Great, a few more, and just MAYBE Joke'n Joe, and his lease holder, will get the MESSAGE...
     
    BTPost, Feb 1, 2013
    #85
  6. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++

     
    CATO, Feb 1, 2013
    #86
  7. ghrit

    ghrit Bad company Administrator Founding Member

    ghrit, Feb 1, 2013
    #87
    NotSoSneaky likes this.
  8. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++

    It would take some huge balls, but Gaston Glock should write a letter stating that he will not sell to any departments serving those cities ruled by tyrannical mayors.

    That would make me go and buy a couple Gen4s.
     
    CATO, Feb 1, 2013
    #88
  9. NotSoSneaky

    NotSoSneaky former supporter


    Now that there is somethig I would like to see!
     
    NotSoSneaky, Feb 2, 2013
    #89
  10. kellory

    kellory An unemployed Jester, is nobody's fool. Banned

    I'm going to take a wild guess here, and assume this means "refuse to sell to them"?o_O
     
    kellory, Feb 2, 2013
    #90
  11. ghrit

    ghrit Bad company Administrator Founding Member

    That and refuse to service any arms that might have been damaged in use, or supply spares.
     
    ghrit, Feb 2, 2013
    #91
  12. kellory

    kellory An unemployed Jester, is nobody's fool. Banned

    Ah.... scorched Earth policy. Got it.
     
    kellory, Feb 2, 2013
    #92
  13. Mountainman

    Mountainman Großes Mitglied Site Supporter+++

    You got it. He told Commifornia to stick it if they want weapons or repair services.
     
    Mountainman, Feb 2, 2013
    #93
  14. DMGoddess

    DMGoddess Monkey+++

    I've got a question, that I don't think they've thought of: If the cities boycott gun manufacturers, what are the cops going to use, water pistols? I agree that someone should point that out to the gun companies, that they can stop this in its tracks.
     
    DMGoddess, Feb 2, 2013
    #94
  15. HK_User

    HK_User A Productive Monkey is a Happy Monkey

    You might want to ask why Colt has not been shut down yet? After all they are in the middle of the pot.

    Contact


    Of course the answer is that the GOV depends on Colt as does a lot of Jobs in Hartford, CT, 06141

    Follow the money trail.
     
    HK_User, Feb 2, 2013
    #95
  16. BTPost

    BTPost Stumpy Old Fart,Deadman Walking, Snow Monkey Moderator

    The answer to your QUESTION is, really another Question...
    If Glock, Colt, Remington, S&W, Ruger, And a whole slew of non-US Gun Manufactures would actually do a Barrett Move, then YES, that would be an approach,
    HOWEVER, much of the production of these firms, depend on Police Purchases, to make them Profitable, they have very limited Incentive to
    do such a thing, especially the non-US manufacturers. Do you think that the Checks, Russians, Brazilians, and Chinese will do the same thing, and not just
    copy the weapons, required, and supply them, to our Police, and take the Profit Offshore. Nope, the reason Barrett can get away with this is He OWNS his Company, AND He markets in a very narrow Nitch Market, that he has almost exclusive, control over..... and even then He can, or could change his Policy at ANY Time, should it start to bite into his Bottom Line, excessively..... ...... YMMV....
     
    BTPost, Feb 2, 2013
    #96
  17. DMGoddess

    DMGoddess Monkey+++

    They don't care a bit about jobs, they've proven that. Weapons for their people, on the other hand, is a COMPLETELY different story. As much as I disliked Bush (and I did), at least we didn't have to worry about our 2nd Amendment rights, just some of our others.
     
    DMGoddess, Feb 2, 2013
    #97
  18. ghrit

    ghrit Bad company Administrator Founding Member

    Might be that the distributors would have to get on board with the mfrs. OK by me.
     
    ghrit, Feb 2, 2013
    #98
  19. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++

    Gun Control Debate Reveals Rift Among Nation's Sheriffs - Officer.com

    When these lawyers say "sheriffs can't decide what is Constitutional . . . that's for the courts" regarding they may not enforce a ban: these yahoos don't get it--gun ownership doesn't even need court consent! There's no reason to have judges debate the issue. The Constitution is very clear--the Bill of Rights does not GRANT citizens the right to own a gun--as if it were a privilege, it clearly states that the government cannot take that God-given right away. So, the sheriffs see this "controversy" as already decided 224 years ago.
     
    CATO, Feb 4, 2013
    #99
    mysterymet, kellory, oldawg and 2 others like this.
  20. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++


    Come on guys . . . a few more big names and LEOs will have to consider Tokarevs.


     
    CATO, Feb 8, 2013
    #100
    NotSoSneaky, ghrit and kellory like this.
Page 5 of 7
survivalmonkey SSL seal        survivalmonkey.com warrant canary
17282WuJHksJ9798f34razfKbPATqTq9E7