Morality...........

Discussion in 'Faith and Religion' started by Bluenote, May 23, 2012.


  1. TwoCrows

    TwoCrows Monkey++

    And my question for you is "Why should non-Christians have to live up to the moral standards that Christians have set ?

    Yes, you claim that they come from your god, but the non-Christians do not believe in your god.

    Why, if we do not accept your god should we be expected to accept your laws over us ?

    In my lifetime there were states which required businesses to close on Sunday, whether the owner was Christian, Jew, Hindu or atheist did not matter.
     
  2. Theocrat

    Theocrat Monkey

    1. you don't have to.
    2. if you find yourself in a community where they are trying to live by God's law, move.
     
  3. Theocrat

    Theocrat Monkey



    There are two problems with your moral complaints. One, people who claim to be “Christian” are not the ones that you should be getting your definition of God’s Theocracy, read the thread I posted called “How God Defines His Theocracy” for further clarification. And two, what absolute and objective standard are you using in order for your moral complaints to make sense. You are actually borrowing from the Christian view of reality where absolute moral laws exist, then jumping back into your own worldview to lodge your moral complaint, you’d be more consistent if you say that you personally don’t like what people have done to each other in the name of their religion.

    And actually, the last time the world saw anything like a Christian theocracy was at the founding of this nation where human freedom and liberty was maximized more than has been seen in any other nation. Did they have some blind spots? Sure, just as any culture does but I would much rather live with the freedom and liberty our forefathers had for the first 50 years of this great nation. And what they were doing was responding to the counterfeit theocracies of the Church of England and the Roman Catholic Church, where I will certainly join you in your moral indignation. The church certainly needs a reformation from time to time and I would contend that we are certainly due for another reformation since the church is remaining silent on the abuses of the State. If you are familiar with the writings of John Calvin, a famous reformer, you will notice that he harshly criticized the Catholic church for it’s abuses and departure from the word of God. If you look it up, you will see that most Christians at the founding of this nation were Calvinists and I would claim that it was precisely because they were recovering a Biblical Theocracy that there was so much freedom at our founding.

    In regard to you’re comment about people saying they are hearing voices from God should be put in a padded room, I don’t know if you were being facetious but as long as they are not hurting anyone, you shouldn’t use the State’s power to lock someone up. If you were being serious, then you are less for human liberty and freedom that I am.
     
  4. TwoCrows

    TwoCrows Monkey++

    Why should I be the one to move if I was here first ?

    Or for that matter here at the same time and as long ?
     
  5. tulianr

    tulianr Don Quixote de la Monkey

    The best indication of the potential future actions of anyone or anything is to examine how that person or thing has behaved in the past. A new Theocracy will very likely behave as past Theocracies have. It would be lunacy to believe otherwise, and using Bible verses to defend an alternative view is illogical.

    That same Bible, and those same verses, existed in the past when such abuses by the church occurred. People couldn't agree on the meaning of those verses then, anymore than they can now; and they were used to excuse the actions of the "faithful" then, just as they are now. Anyone, with any familiarity with the Bible, can use the Bible to defend any position they wish to defend. The same goes for the religious writings of any group. That is why the only logical debate, in which you can use the Bible, is a debate on Christianity. It is the only context in which the writings of the Bible are "intelligible."

    Its bad enough that our politicians are all corrupt. Converting our clergy into politicians only corrupts them as well. Any intelligent church leader would run screaming from the idea of a theocracy.
     
    Yard Dart and Guit_fishN like this.
  6. Theocrat

    Theocrat Monkey

    Well if you don't mind living there, stay then.
     
  7. tulianr

    tulianr Don Quixote de la Monkey

    Apparently, we just posted at the same time. I hadn't viewed this post of yours when I began to compose my last post.

    It appears that you and I can look at the exact same set of facts, and read the same Bible, and get two radically divergent understandings. Perhaps one of us is right, perhaps both of us are right; but more likely neither of us are right. You are going to have to exist in your world, and me in mine, because I am never going to accept your version of history anymore than you are going to accept mine.

    As long as your Theocracy doesn't try to impose your version of religion on me, and my secular government doesn't try to impose my view of religion on you, we'll both be alright.
     
  8. Theocrat

    Theocrat Monkey

    Sure, I think the more we discuss these issues, the more that you will see that we agree. The way I see it, unbelieving liberterians have right beliefs they just don't have the proper foundation in which they can proceed to say liberterian freedom is objectively right and oppressive government is objectively wrong.
     
  9. Theocrat

    Theocrat Monkey


    I can see you still misunderstand what God's Theocracy looks like, if you read my thread on Theocracy, you will see there are no politicians, no taxes, no standing armies, no draft etc.

    Actually, it is when the general population is educated and allowed to interpret the Bible for themselves that is when people are in the most agreement on what the Bible says which in turn makes abusive leaders lose their power, this is what the reformation did. At the founding of this nation, there was a lot more theological agreement than what we see today because they were educated and free. The Marxist controlled education system has done an excellent job of dumbing down the general population of this country and is the root cause of a lot of divisions not just in the church but for everyone. The old divide and conquer strategy.
     
  10. chelloveck

    chelloveck Diabolus Causidicus

    I'm working on a reply to the concept of "God's Theocracy", but in my research so far I have found several diverging notions as to what constitutes God's Theocracy. I am quite partial to the one in the Uncyclopaedia, but I don't think it will find much favour with most theists.


    450px-Theocracy.



    http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Theocracy
    450px-Theocracy. 450px-Theocracy.
     
  11. Seacowboys

    Seacowboys Senior Member Founding Member

    exert from Letters From Earth, Mark Twain....The Adam and Eve Diaries:
    Today we named tadpoles and other members of the whale family.
     
    chelloveck and RightHand like this.
  12. chelloveck

    chelloveck Diabolus Causidicus

    I must have an ancestor in common with whales and tadpoles....at conception, half of me resembled a tadpole O~~~
     
    RightHand likes this.
  13. Seacowboys

    Seacowboys Senior Member Founding Member

    Syllogistic logic; the basis for all religion.
     
    tulianr and chelloveck like this.
  14. Theocrat

    Theocrat Monkey

    They diverge because they don't let God define it, so they tend to define it in such a way that favors themselves. If you read what the Bible has to say on the subject, it turns this idea on its head.
     
  15. chelloveck

    chelloveck Diabolus Causidicus

    The difficulty with accepting the Bible as an authority to determine what God's Theocracy is, and how it is constituted, is that it requires one to accept implicitly that the contents of the Bible are, in toto, factual; that Biblical claims are true, and that the Bible is the inerrant word of a god that actually exists. I could read the Illiad to get some idea of how a pantheistic theocracy might work, but although elements of the Illiad may be rooted in ancient Greek history, nobody would seriously accept the actual existence of the ancient Greek pantheon of gods. Although both Testaments of the Bible contain some elements of historicity, there is little reason to believe that it contains any more factual information within the narrative than does the Odyssey as far as the supernatural is concerned.
     
    TwoCrows and tulianr like this.
  16. Minuteman

    Minuteman Chaplain Moderator Founding Member

    The difference between the Illiad and the Bible is that the Bible has been proven uncannily accurate time and time again. And in ways that defy any logical rationale.

    Historically;
    Down through the centuries, enemies of the Bible have attacked its historical accuracy. Time after time, the Scriptures have been thus questioned, only later to be shown correct by archaeology. Archaeology is a study of relics, monuments, tombs, artifacts, etc., of ancient civilizations. Peoples and events, known before only in Biblical accounts, have been brought to light by the excavations of ancient cities. Always, the Bible has been proven right. Let us consider a few of the cases of such findings:

    Grapes In Egypt:
    In Genesis 40 we are told how Joseph interpreted the dream of Pharaoh's butler. In this dream grapes are mentioned. But the ancient historian, Herodotus, states that the Egyptians grew no grapes and drank no wine, and many therefore questioned the accuracy of the biblical account. However, paintings discovered on the ancient Egyptian tombs, show the dressing, pruning, and cultivating of the vines, and also the process of extracting the juice of grapes, as well as scenes of drunkenness. There can be little doubt then that Herodotus was wrong and the Bible right.

    The Bricks Of Pithom:
    In Exodus 1:11, we are told that the children of Israel built the treasure cities of Pithom and Raamses for Pharaoh. In Exodus 5, we are informed that they made bricks first using straw, and then using stubble, because no straw was furnished them for that purpose. In 1883, Naville, and in 1908, Kyle, found at Pithom, one of the cities built by Israel, that the lower courses were built of bricks filled with good, chopped straw. The middle courses have less straw including stubble. The upper courses were made of pure clay, with no straw whatever. It is difficult to read the biblical account and not be astonished at the amazing confirmation which archaeology here has given to the Bible.

    The Hittites:
    Forty-eight times in the Scriptures, a people called the Hittites are mentioned. We find them blocking Israel's path as it sought to enter the promised land. We read of Uriah, the Hittite, whom David sent to his untimely death. However, in all the records of antiquity, not a reference to those people was to be found, and therefore, the skeptics attributed them to the imagination and fiction. In 1876, George Smith, began a study of monuments at a place called Djerabis in Asia Minor. This city proved out to be old Carchemish, a capital of the ancient Hatti. We now know that the Hatti were the Hittites of the Bible, who, according to Prof. A.H. Sayce, "contended on equal terms with both Egypt and Assyria." The Hittites not only proved to be a real people, but their empire was shown to be one of the great ones of ancient times.

    Sargon:
    In Isaiah 20:1, we read, "In the year that Tartan came unto Ashdod, (when Sargon the king of Assyria sent him)..." This is the only mention of King Sargon in the Bible, and the only one in ancient literature. His place in history was severely questioned on this account. But in the years, 1842-1845, P.E. Botta, uncovered the tremendous royal palace of Sargon. Among the other things discovered was an account of the siege of Ashdod mentioned in Isaiah. Once more the Bible was right, the critics wrong.

    The Flood:
    Genesis 7 and 8 tell us of the destruction of the world by a great flood. To many, the story of the flood is actually a recording of ancient myths. However, we have much evidence outside the Bible to show that the flood was a reality and that the Bible is true. Notice the flood traditions of ancient peoples. One scholar lists 88 different traditional accounts. Almost all of these agree that there was a universal destruction of the human race and all living creatures by a flood. Almost all agree that an ark or a boat was the means of escape. Almost all are in accord in saying that a seed of mankind was left to perpetuate the race. Many add that wickedness of man brought about the flood. Some even mention Noe. Several speak of the dove and the raven, and some discuss a sacrifice offered by those who were saved. To anyone familiar with the biblical account, the similarity is astounding. The universality of this tradition is such as to establish that the biblical flood was not a figment of someone's imagination.

    In 1872, George Smith, discovered the now famous Babylonian flood tablets. In these, a certain person was told to build an ark or ship and to take into it seed of all creatures. He was given the exact measurements and was instructed to use pitch in sealing it. He took his family into the boat with food. There was a terrible storm which lasted six days. They landed on Mt. Nazir. He sent out a dove. It came back. He sent out a swallow. It came back. He sent out a raven and it flew back and forth over the earth. When these people were safely out of the boat, they offered sacrifice to the gods. The account differs from the Bible in some particulars, but is so much in agreement with the Scriptures as to make one wonder how the historical nature of the flood could be questioned.

    Furthermore, archaeology has found positive evidence of a great flood in some ancient cities. At Susa, a solid deposit of earth five feet thick was found between two distinct civilizations. The nature of the deposit establishes beyond doubt that Susa was completely destroyed by a flood which was not merely local. At Ur, the ancient home of Abraham, a similar deposit of water laid clay eight feet thick was found. This deposit clearly shows that Ur was destroyed by a flood of such proportions that is must have been a vast flood such as the one of the Bible. Further evidence could be presented, but this should be sufficient to demonstrate that the Biblical flood was a reality.

    Jericho:
    Joshua 6, tells how Israel conquered the walled city of Jericho. For six day they marched once around the city. On the seventh day they went around it seven times. The priests blew their trumpets, the people shouted, and when they did, "The wall fell down flat" (Joshua 6:20). The people then rushed strait way into the city and burned it. They took none of it to themselves. They saved Rahab who lived in a house upon the wall and who had helped them previously.

    Starting in 1929, Dr. John Garstang, excavated the ruins of ancient Jericho. His discoveries corresponded remarkably with the Biblical account. Jericho, he found, had a double wall, with houses built across the two walls. This explains how Rahab's house could have been built upon a wall. He learned that the wall was destroyed by some kind of violent convulsion such as that described in the Bible, and that when the wall feel that it fell outward, down the hillside, or as the Bible says, it fell down flat. Had the wall been destroyed by the battering rams of an enemy army, the walls would have fallen inward instead of outward. Furthermore, the city had been burned. Once again, the spade of archaeology has established the accuracy of the Bible.

    Scientifically;
    The Bible states scientific principles, thousands of years ago that were not verified until recently.

    The scriptures are replete with statements suggesting scientific knowledge which predates the corresponding discoveries of secular science. Given that Bible writers were not scientists, and given that the scientific information at their disposal was generally misleading, the accuracy of the Bible can only be attributed to the inspiration of God. Here are a few of the more striking examples of scientific accuracy in the Bible:

    1) The Genesis account of creation asserts that all humans descended from the same parents, Adam and Eve. There is now considerable debate in the scientific community over recent genetic studies which indicate that all men have a common father and all women have a common mother. In fact, the latter claim is sometimes called the Eve hypothesis. Some scientists are skeptical about these studies, and even those who are supportive would not generally accept the Genesis account; however, Bible believers should expect further research to add yet more evidence supporting these hypotheses.

    2) Genesis 10:25 speaks of one Peleg whose name means division. The text then explains that he was so named because in his days the earth was divided. It is now commonly believed that all continents of the earth were once combined into a single continent called Pangaea. This belief is based upon the fact that present continents appear somewhat as pieces out of a puzzle. There are also other evidences, including several geological similarities on matching continental edges.

    3) The Bible asserts that the stars are innumerable (Gen 15:5, Gen 17:7, Heb 11:12). This does not necessarily mean that we are incapable of mathematically expressing their number. It means that no human has the ability to count them individually so as to achieve their sum. It is claimed that there are 100 billion stars in our galaxy alone. If stars were counted around the clock at one star per second, then it would take over 3000 years just to count these. Add to this the fact that there are as many as 100 billion galaxies. However, there were many scholars prior to Galileo who believed that the stars could be counted, and several attempts were made to do so. Many of these counts arrived at around 1000 stars.

    4) There is reasonable evidence that the scriptures speak of dinosaurs. As should be expected, this evidence comes from Genesis, the book of origins, and from the book of Job, generally believed to be the oldest book in the Bible.

    First, Gn 1:21 speaks of God creating whales on the fifth day of creation. The Hebrew word translated here as whales is generally translated dragons. It is translated as monsters once, whale(s) twice, serpent(s) thrice, and dragon(s) 21 times.

    Second, Job's statements concerning the behemoth (Job 40:15-24) might be referring to dinosaurs. Its tail is compared to a cedar tree. Its strength, and apparently its bulk, is in its loins. It is said to be the chief of the ways of God, and is described as having the ability to drink up a river. No modern animal meets this description in all points.

    Third, Job's description of the leviathin (Job 41) very much resembles a dinosaur. Some would dismiss this description as fictitious because the leviathin is described as breathing fire; however, some creation scientists believe this could have happened. The creature would merely need glands to produce a chemical which would combust when exposed to air. The bombardier beetle does in fact have this ability. The fact that nearly every major culture of the world has traditions about such dragons lends yet further credibility to the possibility of their existence in the past.

    5) The fact that the earth is of spherical shape is generally considered to be recent knowledge. However, Isaiah 40:22 spoke of the circle of the earth approximately 750 years before Christ.

    Other statements in the Bible also indicate that God revealed this truth long ago. For example, David said that God has removed our transgression from us as far as the east is from the west (Ps 103:12). On a spherical surface, east and west are infinitely separated in the sense that one can travel indefinitely in either direction without ever attaining the other. However, Solomon described the wind as blowing in circuits, first towards the south and then turning toward the north. North and south are not infinitely separated as east and west, because a southward traveler on a spherical surface will be heading north after crossing the south pole.

    6) In possibly the oldest book of the Bible, Job asserted that God hung the earth on nothing (Job 26:7). The first scientist having this understanding would appear to be Copernicus around 1500.

    7) Paul asserted in Acts 17:26 that God hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth. Until recent times, it was believed there was significant differences in the blood of various human races. We now know that all races of men are of common blood.

    8) Psalms 8:4-8 likely reveal the existence of systematic ocean currents:
    What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him? For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour. Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet: All sheep and oxen, yea, and the beasts of the field; The fowl of the air, and the fish of the sea, and whatsoever passeth through the paths of the seas.

    Matthew Maury (1806-1873) is commonly known as the father of oceanography. He was among the first to discover and chart systematic ocean currents. Maury claimed that his research was inspired by Ps 8:4-8.

    9) Job 38:16 speaks of springs in the sea. It is now known that there are indeed such springs on the ocean floor.

    10) The earliest literature indicating an understanding of hydrological cycle was apparently around the third or fourth century BC. However, the essential details of this cycle were all revealed in the Bible well before this time. This may be seen from the following texts:
    The wind goeth toward the south, and turneth about unto the north; it whirleth about continually, and the wind returneth again according to his circuits. All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again. - Eccl 1:6,7
    For he maketh small the drops of water: they pour down rain according to the vapour thereof: which the clouds do drop and distil upon man abundantly. - Job 36:27,28
    It is he that buildeth his stories in the heaven, and hath founded his troop in the earth; he that calleth for the waters of the sea, and poureth them out upon the face of the earth: The LORD is his name. - Amos 9:6

    11) It was not until this century that medical science had a full understanding of the fact that most diseases are caused by infection of microscopic organisms. Accordingly, the medical values of sterilization, sanitation, and quarantines were virtually unappreciated. Yet the Bible is so replete with such wisdom that time and space are not sufficient to cover them in paper such as this. Here are some examples:

    This is the law, when a man dieth in a tent: all that come into the tent, and all that is in the tent, shall be unclean seven days. And every open vessel, which hath no covering bound upon it, is unclean. And whosoever toucheth one that is slain with a sword in the open fields, or a dead body, or a bone of a man, or a grave, shall be unclean seven days. - Num 19:14-16

    And the leper in whom the plague is, his clothes shall be rent, and his head bare, and he shall put a covering upon his upper lip, and shall cry, Unclean, unclean. All the days wherein the plague shall be in him he shall be defiled; he is unclean: he shall dwell alone; without the camp shall his habitation be. - Lev 13:45,46

    These considerations, and many other evidences, serve to confirm the necessity of Divine inspiration to account for the wisdom of the Bible. May we therefore concur with Paul:

    All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. - II Tim 3:16,17
     
  17. tulianr

    tulianr Don Quixote de la Monkey

    Minuteman, that's some serious research, and a very interesting post. But, it really confirms to me only what I already believed about the Bible - that it contains much wisdom, and a lot of historical allusion, which has helped to fill in our understanding of those times, when there is otherwise little written narrative.

    Using your own line of reasoning, when Heinrich Schliemann, with a copy of the Iliad in his hand, visited the area of the Aegean in 1871, and went to where the Iliad said that the mythical city of Troy should be, he found it. In fact, he found several "Troys" which had been built one atop another over the centuries. Most Archeologists now accept his find (though he initially excavated too deeply) as the actual city of Troy in Homer's Iliad.

    When he traveled to where Homer said the city of King Agamemnon, Mycenae, should be, he found it. In fact, in almost every case, when the Iliad said that a city existed in 1200 BCE in a particular place, Schliemann indeed found the ruins of such a city. It is now accepted as archeological fact that the Trojan War indeed took place, and that the places mentioned in Homer's Iliad in fact existed. All this, even though the Greeks had lost the ability to write around 1200 BCE, and their society collapsed, and they didn't regain literacy until 800 BCE, in Homer's time. It was four centuries before most of the facts surrounding the Trojan War were actually written down, but those facts seem to have survived through verbal retelling of the tales. (Very similar to what took place with many Biblical stories.)

    It is now a fairly well accepted archeological theory that the Trojan War was what led to the collapse of the Greek civilization and that a domino effect from that event helped to destroy all of the Mediterranean Bronze Age civilizations, bringing the Bronze Age to an end. It is even believed by many archeologists that the Philistines of the Bible were descendants of Mycenaean Greeks. They were referred to as "Sea People" in the Bible, when they raided Egypt and were resettled along the coast of Canaan by the Egyptian Pharaoh, and the names of the different groups of these Sea People strongly suggest Greek placenames. The discovery of Mycenaean pottery in the ruins of Philistine towns only further solidify this claim. Goliath could very well have been the grandson of one of the Greek heroes who fought at the walls of Troy.

    So, that the Iliad contains much historical fact cannot really be challenged, and research of the stories recounted in the Iliad have shown that there is as much truth there as there is myth, but does that make the Iliad the divine word of God? I don't think anyone would seriously suggest that, except maybe Alexander, who slept with a copy of it each night.
     
    TwoCrows likes this.
  18. Minuteman

    Minuteman Chaplain Moderator Founding Member

    Yes you are right, the Illiad does contain historical truths and is therefore in many regards a reliable source, and that in no way implies or requires divine revelation. But the difference with scripture is twofold, first as I illustrated above the revealed scientific knowledge that has only been confirmed in our recent history defies logic, unless you subscribe to the wild Ancient Aliens theory that is popular now. But the real evidence of divine inspiration of scripture is fulfilled prophecy. Accurate, specific, verifiable fulfillment. Not vague,rambling, could fit anything, Nostradumbass type prophecies.

    Approximately 2500 prophecies are given in the pages of scripture. Of these, 2000 have been fulfilled. To the letter, without error. God knew that people would question the validity of scripture and he says that he included within it's pages the proof that it is indeed his inspired word.

    "Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:" Isiah 46:10
    Declaring the end from the beginning - Foretelling accurately the course of future events. This is an argument to which God often appeals in proof that he is the only true God (see Isaiah 41:22-23; Isaiah 43:12; Isaiah 44:26).

    The chance for all of these prophecies to come to be by pure chance, without error, is less than one in 10 to the 2000th power. That is a ten with 2000 zeros after it!

    The litmus test for any prophet of the bible was 100% accuracy. Anyone who dared to prophesy and claim it to be the word of God had to be 100% accurate or the penalty was death.

    I could fill this entire thread with all 2000 of the 100% accurately fulfilled prophecies contained in holy writ but for brevety here is just a sampling.

    (1) Some time before 500 B.C. the prophet Daniel proclaimed that Israel's long-awaited Messiah would begin his public ministry 483 years after the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem (Daniel 9:25-26). He further predicted that the Messiah would be "cut off," killed, and that this event would take place prior to a second destruction of Jerusalem. Abundant documentation shows that these prophecies were perfectly fulfilled in the life (and crucifixion) of Christ. The decree regarding the restoration of Jerusalem was issued by Persia's King Artaxerxes to the Hebrew priest Ezra in 458 B.C., 483 years later, to the very day, Yahshua Meshiach, Jesus the Christ, entered into the gates of Jerusalem to begin his ministry. His crucifixion occurred only a few years later, and about four decades later, in 70 A.D. came the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus.
    (Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 105.)*

    (*that is 10 to the 5th power, or one in a million chance)



    (2) In approximately 700 B.C. the prophet Micah named the tiny village of Bethlehem as the birthplace of Israel's Messiah (Micah 5:2). The fulfillment of this prophecy in the birth of Christ is one of the most widely known and widely celebrated facts in history.
    (Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 105.)


    (3) In the fifth century B.C. a prophet named Zechariah declared that the Messiah would be betrayed for the price of a slave—thirty pieces of silver, according to Jewish law-and also that this money would be used to buy a burial ground for Jerusalem's poor foreigners (Zechariah 11:12-13). Bible writers and secular historians both record thirty pieces of silver as the sum paid to Judas Iscariot for betraying Jesus, and they indicate that the money went to purchase a "potter's field," used—just as predicted—for the burial of poor aliens (Matthew 27:3-10).
    (Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 1011.)


    (4) Some 400 years before crucifixion was invented, both Israel's King David and the prophet Zechariah described the Messiah's death in words that perfectly depict that mode of execution. Further, they said that the body would be pierced and that none of the bones would be broken, contrary to customary procedure in cases of crucifixion (Psalm 22 and 34:20; Zechariah 12:10). Again, historians and New Testament writers confirm the fulfillment: Jesus of Nazareth died on a Roman cross, and his extraordinarily quick death eliminated the need for the usual breaking of bones. A spear was thrust into his side to verify that he was, indeed, dead.
    (Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 1013.)


    (5) The prophet Isaiah foretold that a conqueror named Cyrus would destroy seemingly impregnable Babylon and subdue Egypt along with most of the rest of the known world. This same man, said Isaiah, would decide to let the Jewish exiles in his territory go free without any payment of ransom (Isaiah 44:28; 45:1; and 45:13). Isaiah made this prophecy 150 years before Cyrus was born, 180 years before Cyrus performed any of these feats (and he did, eventually, perform them all), and 80 years before the Jews were taken into exile.
    (Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 1015.)


    (6) Mighty Babylon, 196 miles square, was enclosed not only by a moat, but also by a double wall 330 feet high, each part 90 feet thick. It was said by unanimous popular opinion to be indestructible, yet two Bible prophets declared its doom. These prophets further claimed that the ruins would be avoided by travelers, that the city would never again be inhabited, and that its stones would not even be moved for use as building material (Isaiah 13:17-22 and Jeremiah 51:26, 43). Their description is, in fact, the well-documented history of the famous citadel.
    (Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 109.)


    (7) The exact location and construction sequence of Jerusalem's nine suburbs was predicted by Jeremiah about 2600 years ago. He referred to the time of this building project as "the last days," that is, the time period of Israel's second rebirth as a nation in the land of Palestine (Jeremiah 31:38-40). This rebirth became history in 1948, and the construction of the nine suburbs has gone forward precisely in the locations and in the sequence predicted.
    (Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 1018.)


    (8) The prophet Moses foretold (with some additions by Jeremiah and Jesus) that the ancient Jewish nation would be conquered twice and that the people would be carried off as slaves each time, first by the Babylonians (for a period of 70 years), and then by a fourth world kingdom (which we know as Rome). The second conqueror, Moses said, would take the Jews captive to Egypt in ships, selling them or giving them away as slaves to all parts of the world. Both of these predictions were fulfilled to the letter, the first in 607 B.C. and the second in 70 A.D. God's spokesmen said, further, that the Jews would remain scattered throughout the entire world for many generations, but without becoming assimilated by the peoples or of other nations, and that the Jews would one day return to the land of Palestine to re-establish for a second time their nation (Deuteronomy 29; Isaiah 11:11-13; Jeremiah 25:11; Hosea 3:4-5 and Luke 21:23-24).
    This prophetic statement sweeps across 3500 years of history to its complete fulfillment—in our lifetime.
    (Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 120.)


    (9) Jeremiah predicted that despite its fertility and despite the accessibility of its water supply, the land of Edom (today a part of Jordan) would become a barren, uninhabited wasteland (Jeremiah 49:15-20; Ezekiel 25:12-14). His description accurately tells the history of that now bleak region.
    (Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 105.)


    (10) Joshua prophesied that Jericho would be rebuilt by one man. He also said that the man's eldest son would die when the reconstruction began and that his youngest son would die when the work reached completion (Joshua 6:26). About five centuries later this prophecy found its fulfillment in the life and family of a man named Hiel (1 Kings 16:33-34).
    (Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 107).


    (11) The day of Elijah's supernatural departure from Earth was predicted unanimously—and accurately, according to the eye-witness account—by a group of fifty prophets (2 Kings 2:3-11).
    (Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 109).


    (12) Jahaziel prophesied that King Jehoshaphat and a tiny band of men would defeat an enormous, well-equipped, well-trained army without even having to fight. Just as predicted, the King and his troops stood looking on as their foes were supernaturally destroyed to the last man (2 Chronicles 20).
    (Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 108).


    (13) One prophet of God (unnamed, but probably Shemiah) said that a future king of Judah, named Josiah, would take the bones of all the occultic priests (priests of the "high places") of Israel's King Jeroboam and burn them on Jeroboam's altar (1 Kings 13:2 and 2 Kings 23:15-18). This event occurred approximately 300 years after it was foretold.
    (Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 1013).

    No tome ever written in the history of the world, no "holy" book of any other religion that has ever been created by the mind of man can make this claim. The verified fulfillment of prophecy is the proof that the Bible is the inspired words of an omnipotent creator that is involved with and manages the affairs of this world to his own ends.
     
    Sapper John likes this.
  19. tulianr

    tulianr Don Quixote de la Monkey

    I think though, that it is a matter of opinion as to whether or not many of those prophesies were fulfilled. The faithful will say yes, and non-Christians will say no. People can have the same disagreement over the prophesies of Nostradamus, or those of any other person purporting to be able to see the future. The mindset of the reader is the determining factor.

    Jews read, and many believe in the validity of, those prophesies; but may not agree with the Christian that any of the prophesies concerning the Messiah have come true, because they don't accept that Jesus of Nazareth was the Messiah mentioned in those prophesies. Two groups of people, both believers, who have a different view of the same prophesy.

    In the end, it is still going to come down to faith.
     
    TwoCrows and BTPost like this.
  20. Minuteman

    Minuteman Chaplain Moderator Founding Member

    I concede that there are some of the 2500 prophecies that are rather vague and their fulfillment might be in the eye of the beholder. But I deliberately chose the ones above that are very specific in nature and not subject to interpretation. They either happened or they didn't. The very first one is the most important. Daniel very plainly said that after 483 years from the issuing of the decree to rebuild Jerusalem that the Messiah would come. Yashua (Jesus) began his ministry exactly, to the very day, 483 yrs after the edict. So either he was the one foretold by Daniel, or Daniel was wrong. And according to God any prophet not 100% correct was a false prophet.
    And you have to realize that at the time there were no Christians. All of the early church that accepted Yahshua as the Messiah, the one foretold by the prophets, were Hebrews. It was the very fulfillment of those prophecies that led thousands to accept him and promote him as Messiah even though it cost many their lives.

    One has to understand also just who those are who reject the fulfillment of those prophecies. There were two groups of "Jews" in Jerusalem in the time of Christ. There were the Judahites that had remained there after the capture of the city by Nebuchadnezzar that practiced the traditional Hebrew religion and worshiped the Hebrew God. Then there the ones who had returned from Babylon after the captivity and practiced a perverted form of worship that had incorporated much of the Babylonian mysticism into it. These were the elite and the upper class of the time. These are the ones whom Christ was addressing when he said; "those who call themselves Jews but are not, they are of the synagogue of Satan."

    These are the ones who rejected him then and still reject him today. They could not reconcile the spiritual savior with the physical savior. They were expecting a hero who would come and destroy the Romans and drive them from Judea. They quizzed him extensively because they saw the fulfillment of prophecy in his life and actions and they believed he very well could be the Messiah. But when he failed to perform the acts they mistakenly believed he was to do, they rejected him and called for his death.

    But here we are today, 2000 years later and not one single person has ever emerged that even in the most vaguest of ways has fulfilled one single prophecy of the Messiah. So according to Gods law, all of the old testament prophets have failed and are false and the entire belief system of these Talmudic Jews is false. They attempt to have it both ways.

    So to claim that the fulfillment of Messianic prophecy is a matter of faith is simply disingenuous. If as you claim it is a matter of the readers interpretation then the Jews have to believe that 1) the city of Jerusalem must be destroyed in the future. 2) a Persian ruler must issue an edict to rebuild it 3) some 400 years after that a man must be born in the city of Bethlehem, come in and save the people living there at that time 4) be cut off 5) be betrayed for 30 pieces of silver 6) be crucified, but have no bones broken.... and on and on.
    You get the point. Either these things have come to pass or they haven't. There is no faith, no interpretation involved.

    Many of these prophecies are very specific and detailed. They are not "the lion of the moon will come from the land of the yellow sun" type nonsense that you find in Nostradamus type soothsayers vague and nonsensical "predictions". Predictions that can only be understood after the fact and can be applied to a dozen different scenarios throughout history.

    The clear and detailed description of future events, events that have come to pass, is the strongest proof that scripture is divinely inspired.
     
survivalmonkey SSL seal        survivalmonkey.com warrant canary
17282WuJHksJ9798f34razfKbPATqTq9E7